This is back to the old David Storey/Wrawick Business School stuff you were banging on about back at the start of the Business Links. So nothing has changed. And the focus ios still on start-ups even though they are like a lottery. When will small business policy follow the economics and not the politics of the situation?
Yes it is almost identical to the stats from the early 90s - an argument that suggested a lot more effort should go into supporting growing businesses and less into start-ups which are a lottery!
Yes it is almost identical to the stats from the early 90s - an argument that suggested a lot more effort should go into supporting growing businesses and less into start-ups which are a lottery!
8 comments:
This is back to the old David Storey/Wrawick Business School stuff you were banging on about back at the start of the Business Links. So nothing has changed. And the focus ios still on start-ups even though they are like a lottery. When will small business policy follow the economics and not the politics of the situation?
Yes it is almost identical to the stats from the early 90s - an argument that suggested a lot more effort should go into supporting growing businesses and less into start-ups which are a lottery!
RC
- which was the original brief for the Business Link. Full circle, eh!
Yes. But that was a along time ago!
This is the "startups are a lottery; bet on the high growth businesses... cos you might get some of your money back" argument.
It just rolls and rolls...
An example of Bus Schl research offering some kind of insight that can be applied or used. No blueprints here!
- which was the original brief for the Business Link. Full circle, eh!
Yes it is almost identical to the stats from the early 90s - an argument that suggested a lot more effort should go into supporting growing businesses and less into start-ups which are a lottery!
RC
Post a Comment